Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

Investigating the engineering hydrogeomorphological characteristics of the Gian catchment and river of Nahavand in the Hamadan province

Authors
Damghan University
Abstract
Assessing and understanding the hydromorphological characteristics are necessary to understand the behavior of a river and its active processes. This is useful for understanding the erosion and sedimentation regime and changing the river path, for making correct engineering and human activities in the river's catchment area. The Gian River, with an average annual discharge of 2.3 m3/s, is one of the tributaries of the Gamasiab River in the Hamedan province. From a geological and hydrogeomorphological point of view, the Gian is a small river. It is fully compatible with the geological structures of the region. The calculation of the sinusoidal coefficient has shown that this river is a meandering river whose wavelength, the amplitude of the oscillation and the width of the meander belt are smaller in the mountainous area than in the plain area The gradient of the river bed is relatively low and it is classified as an erosion and sedimentation river in its different sections. The Gian River has a rocky bed in the mountainous part and an alluvial bed in the plain. The Gian River has a small catchment area, and, according to theGravelius' coefficient, its shape is almost elongated. The catchment elevation of the Gian River is between 1455 and 2700 with a weighted average of 1715.20 m.a.s.l. and its area decreases with the increase in the elevation. The concentration time of the catchment is 4.204 hours. The application of the data and results of the research can be very effective in land use planning, engineering and executive applications to predict river changes and protect engineering structures such as roads, bridges, coastal structures and railways, protect agricultural lands in the region and develop tourism.
Keywords

Belletti, B., Rinaldi, M., Bussettini, M., Comiti, F.M., Gurnell, A., Mao, L., Nardi, L., Vezza, P., 2017. Characterizing physical habitats and fluvial hydromorphology: A new system for the survey and classification of river geomorphic units. Geomorphology, 283, 143–157.
Biswas, S., Ghosh, S., Halder, R., 2021. Impact of human intervention on assessing downstream channel behavior of Ichamati River on the lower Gangetic Plain of West Bengal, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ, 7, 1651–1665.
Coates, D.R., 1980. Geomorphology and Engineering. Allen & Unwin Publication, p. 360.
Davis, W.M., 1899. The geographical cycle. Geographic Journal 14, 481–504.
Deng B, Xiong K, Huang Z, Jiang C, Liu J, Luo W, Xiang Y., 2022. Monitoring and Predicting Channel Morphology of the Tongtian River. Headwater of the Yangtze River Using Landsat Images and Lightweight Neural Network. Remote Sensing, 14(13), 3107.
Gilvear, D.J., 1999. Fluvial geomorphology and river engineering: future roles. Geomorphology, 31(1-4), 229–245.
Gravellious, H.F., 1914. Berlin and leipzing.
Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional Development of Streams and their Drainage Basins: Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology. Geological Society of American Bulletin 56, 275–370.
Kirpich Z.P., 1940. Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civil Engineering, 10, 362.
Laimer, H.J., 1999. Engineering geomorphology: A novel professional profile to face applied challenges in earth surface dynamics in mid-Europe. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1–9.
Langat, PK., Kumar, L., Koech, R., 2019. Monitoring River channel dynamics using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Geomorphology, 325, 92–102.
Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G., 1957. River channel patterns: braided, meandering, and straight. U.S. Geological Survey Prof. 282B.
Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G., Miller, J.P., 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Freeman, San Francisco, CA 522.
Mahdavi, M.A., 1992. 1:100000 scaled geological map of Nahavand. Geological Survey of Iran.
Miller, V.C., 1953. A Quantitative Geomorphic Study of Drainage Basin Characteristics in the Clinch Mountain Area. New York. Columbia University, Virginia and Tennessee, Proj. NR, Technical Report, 389–402.
Newson, M., 2022. Fluvial geomorphology and environmental design: Restitution for damage, rehabilitation, restoration or rewilding? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 47(2), 409-421.
Rasgen, D.L., 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22, 169–199.
Rauch, H.P., von der Thannen, M., Raymond, P., Mira, E. and Evette, A., 2022. Ecological challenges for the use of soil and water bioengineering techniques in river and coastal engineering projects. Ecological Engineering, 176, 106539.
Schumm, S.A., 1963. A tentative classification of alluvial river channels. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 477. Washington, DC.
Schumm, S.A., 1956. Evolution of Drainage System and Slope in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 67, 597–646.
Thorndycraft, V.K., Benito, G., Gregory, K.J., 2008. Fluvial geomorphology: a perspective on current status and methods. Geomorphology, 98, 2–12.
Watson, C.C., Biedenharn, D.S., Scott, S.H., 1999. Channel Rehabilitation: Processes, Design and Implementation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Coastal Nonpoint Source Program.