Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

Experimental Investigation of Ring Footing Laid on Sand Bed Reinforced with Rubber Particles

Authors
Mohammad Hossein Keyghobadi
Adel Asakereh
Behzad Kalantari
Masoud Dehghani
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
10.52547/jeg.15.1.125
Abstract
Introduction

The ring footings are very important and sensitive due to widespread use in various industries such as oil and gas; so finding some ways for improving the behavior of these types of footings can be very valuable. One of these ways, which is very affordable and also can be help in environmental protection, is the use of granulated rubber that made from disposable materials like scrape tires, as the soil reinforcement. In the present study, the behavior of ring footings with outer constant diameter of 300 mm and variable inner diameters (90, 120 and 150 mm with inner to outer diameter ratio of 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5) placed on unreinforced sand bed and also granulated rubber reinforced bed, has been investigated by field test. The effects of important parameters like inner to outer diameter ratio of ring footing and thickness of rubber-soil mixture on the behavior of ring footing in terms of bearing capacity, settlement and inside vertical stresses of footing bed have been studied and the optimum values mentioned parameters have been determined.

Material and methods

In all tests, a sandy soil was used to fill the test trench which was excavated in the natural bed of the earth with a length and width of 2000 mm and a height of 990 mm. It should be noted that the type of this soil is well-graded sand (SW) according to the Unified Classification System (ASTM D 2487-11). This sand had medium grain size, D50, of 2.35 mm, moisture content of 5.4% and friction angle of 41.7∘. The granulated rubber particles with dimensions between 2-20 mm, a mean particle size, D50, of 14 mm and a specific gravity, Gs, of 1.15, have been used in all tests for using in rubber-soil mixture layer.

The loading system consists of several parts such as loading frame for providing reaction force, hydraulic jack, load cell, load transfer system (including loading shaft which was located below Load cell and footing cap which was located under the loading shaft) and rigid steel loading plates with different inner to outer diameter ratios (d/D=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and constant outer diameter of 300 mm). Some devices like load cell, LVDT, pressure cell, data logger and unit control were applied to collect the data and control the system. Both soil and rubber-soil mixture layers were compacted by vibrating plate compactor to gain their maximum densities. After preparing the tests, the static load was applied on the system at a rate of 1 kPa per second until 1000 kPa or until backfill failure.

Results and discussion

The results of tests on both unreinforced and rubber reinforced beds indicated that the ring footing with inner to outer diameter ratio (d/D) of 0.4 had the maximum bearing capacity in all settlement levels. This behavior can be related to the arching phenomenon within the internal spaces of ring footing with optimum inner to outer diameter ratio. In fact, when the ring footing with optimum inner to outer diameter ratio is subjected to a certain level of loading, the soil inside the ring seems to be compacted due to interface effect of the two sides of the ring. However, by increasing the inner to outer diameter ratio more than its optimum value, the ring behaves like two independent strip footings without any interface effect and therefore the bearing capacity decreases.

The results of tests showed that the vertical inside stresses in different depths of footing bed (both unreinforced and rubber reinforced beds) decrease with increasing d/D ratio. This stress reduction process can be due to the transfer of stress concentration from the points close to the center of the ring to the outer point because of turning from the ring mode with interface effect to the two independent strip footings that mentioned earlier.

The results of rubber reinforced cases illustrated that, regardless of the footing settlement level and also irrespective of d/D ratio, the bearing capacity of ring footing increases with increasing the thickness of rubber-soil mixture layer (hrs) up to the value equals 0.5 times the outer diameter of ring footing and further increase in this thickness more than mentioned optimum value (hrs/D=0.5) can decrease the bearing capacity. Even in some cases of reinforced base (hrs/D=1), the bearing capacity can be reduced to the value less than that of unreinforced cases. It can be due to high compressibility of rubber reinforced layers with higher thicknesses than optimum value.

It should be mentioned that the rubber reinforced layer can reduce the vertical inside stresses compared to unreinforced cases. It can be due to this fact that the rubber reinforced layer acts as a wide slab. Such that it can spread the applied loading over a wider area. Also rubber reinforced layer has high capacity of absorbing energy and therefore can decrease the vertical inside stresses.

Conclusion

In the present study the behavior of ring footing placed on rubber reinforced bed have been investigated by field test. The effect of different parameters such as inner to outer diameter ratio of ring footing and the thickness of rubber-soil mixture layer on the bearing capacity, settlement and vertical inside stresses of the footing bed were studied. The result indicates that:

- In both unreinforced and rubber reinforced bed, the ring footing with inner to outer diameter ratio (d/D) of 0.4 had the maximum bearing capacity, regardless of settlement level.

-The vertical inside stresses in different depths of footing bed decrease with increasing d/D ratio.

-The bearing capacity of ring footing increases with increasing the thickness of rubber-soil mixture layer (hrs) up to the optimum value equals 0.5 times the outer diameter of ring footing.

-The vertical stresses can be reduced by using rubber reinforced layer../files/site1/files/151/5.pdf
Keywords
Ring footing
sand
rubber particle
bearing capacity
vertical stress
1. Sharma V., Kumar A., "Influence of relative density of soil on performance of fiber-reinforced soil foundations", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 45 (5) (2017) 9-507.## 2. Ranjan G, Saran S., Gupta A. K., Beaviour of ring footings on sand under vertical and horizontal loads, 9thAsian Geotechnical Conference, Bankok, Thiland, (1987). ## 3. Ohri M. L., Purhit D. G. M., Dubey M. L., "Behavior of ring footings on dune sand overlaying dense sand", International Conference of Civil Engineers, Tehran, Iran (1997). ## 4. Boushehrian J. H., Hataf, N., "Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 21 (4) (2003) 241-256. ## 5. Laman M., Yildiz A. "Numerical study of ring foundation on geogrid reinforced sand", Geosynthetics international, Vol.14 (2) (2007) 52-64. ## 6. EI Sawwaf M., Nazir A., "Behavior of eccentrically loaded small-scale ring footings resting on reinforced layered soil", Journal of geotechnic and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol.138(3) (2012) 376-384. ## 7. Kumar J., Ghosh, P., "Bearing capacity factor Nγ for ring footings using the method of characteristics", Canadian geotechnical journal, Vol. 42 (5) (2005) 1474-148. ## 8. Zhao L., Wang, J.H. "Vertical bearing capacity for ring footings" Computers and Geotechnics, Vol.35(2) (2008) 292–304. ## 9. Keshavarz A., Kumar J., "Bearing capacity computation for a ring foundation using the stress characteristics method", Computer and Geotechnics, Vol. 89 (2017) 33-42. ## 10. USTMA, U.S., Tire Manufacturers Association, U.S. Scrape Tire Management Summary (2018). ## 11. Gotteland P., Lambert S., Balachowski L., "Strength characteristics of tyre chips-sand mixtures", Studia geotechnica et mechanica, 27 (1-2) (2005) 55-66. ## 12. Anvari S. M., Shooshpasha I., "Influence of size of granulated rubber on bearing capacity of fine-grained sand", Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 9 (18) (2016) 707##. 13. Kyser D., Ravichandran N., "Properties of chipped rubber roofing membrane and sand mixtures for civil engineering applications" Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 7 (2016) 103-113. ## 14. Bali Reddy S., Pradeep Kumar D., Murali Krishna A., "Evaluation of the optimum mixing ratio of a sand-tire chips mixture for geoengineering applications", Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol.28(2) (2016) 1-7. ## 15. Chenari R. J., Fatahi B., Maroufi M. A. A., Alaie R., "An experimental and numerical investigation into the compressibility and settlement of sand mixed with TDA", Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 35 (5) (2017) 1-20. ## 16. Tajdini M., Nabizadeh A., Taherkhani H., Zartaj H., "Effect of added waste rubber on the properties and failure mode of kaolinite clay", International Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 15 (6) (2017) 949-958. ## 17. Rezazadeh Eidgahee D., Haddad A., Naderpour H., Evaluation of shear strength parameters of granulated waste rubber using artificial neural networks and group method of data handling, Scientia Irania, (2018). ## 18. Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N., Norouzi A. H., "Bearing capacity of a square model footing on sand reinforced with shredded tire–an experimental investigation", Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 35 (2012) 457-556. ## 19. Moghaddas Tafreshi S.N., Joz Darabi N., Tavakoli Mehrjardi G.H., Dawson A. R., "Experimental and numerical investigation of footing behaviour on multi-layered rubber-reinforced soil", European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, (2016) 1-24. ## 20. Mittal R. K., Gill G., "Pressure settlement behaviour of strip footing resting on tire-chip reinforced sand", International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, (2017) 1-7. ## 21. ASTM D 2487-11, "Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)", American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, (2011). ## 22. Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N., Khalaj O., Dawson A. R., "Pilot-scale load tests of a combined multilayered geocell and rubber-reinforced foundation", Geosynthetic International, Vol. 20 (3) (2013) 143-161. ## 23. Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N., Darabi N., Dawson A. R., "Cyclic loading response of footing on multi-layered rubber-soil mixtures", Geomechanics and Engineering, Vol. 14 (2) (2018) 115-129. ## 24. Hsieh C., Mao L., "A bench-scale performance test for evaluation of the geosynthetic reinforcement effects on granular base courses", Geosynthetics Research and Development in Progress (2005) 1-11. ## 25. Tavakoli Mehrjardi G. H., Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N., Dawson A. R, "Combined use of geocell reinforcement and rubbere-soil mixtures to improve performance of buried pipes", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 34 (2012) 116-130. ## 26. Tafreshi S. N., Norouzi2a A., "Application of waste rubber to reduce the settlement of road embankment", Geomechanics and Engineering, Vol. 9 (2) (2015) 219-241. ## 27. Joz Darabi N., Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N. "Investigation into footing behavior of layered granulated rubber-soil mixture: Experimental study on small and large scale models", Sharif journal civil engineering, Vol. 32, 2 (2.2) (2016) 79-88. In Persian. ## 28. ASTM D1556/D1556M-15, "Standard test method for density and unit weight of soil in place by the sand-cone method", American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2015). ## 29. Tavakoli Mehrjardi G. H., Jamshidi H., "Bearing capacity and settlement of ring footing", Thechnical and Soil Mechanics Lab Co, (2010) Book In Persian. ## 30. Dash S. K., Sireesh S., Sitharam T. G., "Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 21 (4) (2003) 197-219. ## 31. Patra C. R., Das B. M., Atala C., "Bearing capacity of embaded strip foundation on geogrid reinforced sand", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 23 (5) (2005) 454-462. ## 32. Sitharam T. G., Sireesh S., Dash S. K., "Performance of surface footing on geocell reinforced soft clay beds", Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 25 (5) (2007) 509-524. ## 33. Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N., Dawson A. R., "Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 28 (1) (2010a) 72-84. ## 34. Moghaddas Tafreshi S. M., Khalaj O., Dawson A. R., "Repeated loading of soil containing granulated rubber and multiple geocell layers", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 42 (1) (2014) 25-38. ##