Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

The Influence of Structural Setting and Lithology on Landslide Type and Pattern in Qazvin-Rasht Freeway

Authors
1 Department of Geology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, IRAN
2 Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, IRAN
Abstract
Introduction

Landslides have an effective role in the destruction of freeways and railroads, which have been caused to many human and financial losses. Understanding this phenomenon and its effective factors can be important in planning for development projects and away from landslide prone areas. Based on extensive field in the Qazvin-Rasht freeway that the authors carried out in various researches in 2014-2017, it was found that the freeway was threatened by the type of instabilities due to variety of lithologies and tectonic structures exploitation phase and needs to be stabilized. The purpose of this study is to determine of the distribution of landslides in different types of lithologicalunits of the Qazvin-Rasht freewaythat shows the role of geology and differences in geotechnical characteristics and tectonic structures in the creation and distribution of landslides on the road.The role of geology on the difference in geotechnical properties and tectonic structures in the creation and distribution in the road. Geological engineering properties and appropriate stabilization methods is the other goals of this study.

Material and Methods

In the study, the locations and the type of landslides are distinguished and the information were plotted on geological map. Then by the ARC GIS 10.2 program, and the use of area density method, the percentage of landslide events in each geological formation was identified. In order to study the role of lithology (type of rock, texture, mineralogy, weathering, alteration and erosion), sampling were carried out from rocks of Karaj formation, Shemshak formation, Cretaceous orbitalolina limestone and Fajan conglomerate. Geotechnical characteristics of the samples were determined by performing laboratory tests such as dry weight, porosity, uni-axial compressive strength according to ISRM standard (1979). For determining the role of tectonic structures (number of joints, dip and dip direction, length (m), spacing (cm), filling percentage, opening (mm), roughness, weathering, water, friction angle) were performed. Then, the results obtained from relative density and frequency were matched with the geological, geotechnical characteristics and tectonic structures of each formation.

Results

In order to separate different types of landslides on various kinds of rocks, area density and frequencyof landslides were determined by Eqs 1 and 2. Graph of frequency and area density are presented in Fig. 6 and Table 2, respectively. As can be seen in this figure and table, in Karaj formation, the percentage of rock fall, toppling, avalanche, scree slope and combined slip are the highest. In the rocks belonging to the Shemshak formation, the susceptibility of the debris flow and landslides has been increased. In Fajan conglomerates and limestones of the Ziarat and Cretaceous formations, the rockfalls is more formed.

where LI: area density, AL: area of landslides in each lithological unit, AT: area of landslides in total area.

where LF: frequency of landslide, NL: number of landslides in each lithological unit, NT: number of landslides in total area.

Conclusion

Result showed that despite significant heterogeneity in lithology, geotechnics, engineering geology and tectonic structures, there are similarities between the types and distribution of landslides. Four of the identified landslides consist of rock fall, toppling, avalanche in the resistant and medium strength rocks such as andesite, trachy-andesite and basalts of Karaj formation, Cretaceous orbitalolina limestone and Fajan conglomerate with regard to the dominant direction of the joints in relation to the slope, the shear strength of the joints and their weathering, falling and scree slope in thesiliceous zone and composite landslide in the argilite-alounite zone due to the high alteration and groundwater level and water retention by the presence of clay minerals, landslide in the sequence of loose and resistant rocks, debris flow and landslides in the soils of Shemshak formation due to the lepidoblastic texture of the slate and their high erosion potential due to the weather climate along the Manjil-Rudbar freeway../files/site1/files/151/4.pdf
Keywords

1. Wei Z., Yin G., Wang J.G., Wan L., Jin L.,"Stability analysis and supporting system design of a high-steep cut soil slope on an ancient landslide during highway construction of Tehran–Chalus", Environ Earth Sci. 67 (2012) 1651-1662.## 2. Henriques C., Zêzere J.L., Marques F.,"The role of the lithological setting on the landslide pattern and distribution", Engineering Geology. 189 (2015) 17-31. ## 3. Vezzoli L., Apuani T., Corazzato C., Uttini A.,"Geological and geotechnical characterization of the debris avalanche and pyroclastic deposits of Cotopaxi Volcano (Ecuador). A contribute to instability-related hazard studies", Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 332(2017) 51-70. ## 4. Tavoularis N., Koumantakis I., Rozos D., Koukis G., "The contribution of landslide susceptibility factors through the use of Rock Engineering System (RES) to the prognosis of slope failures: An application in Panagopoula and Malakasal areas in Greece", Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 36 (3) (2018) 1491-1508. ## 5. Abd-Allah A.M.A., El-Sawy E.K., Abu Seif E.S.S., El-Fakharani A., Sharaf M.A.,"Rock slope stability and design in Arafat–Muzdalifa area, Saudi Arabia", Arab J Geosci. 7(2014) 4029-4042. ## 6. Borrelli L., Ciurleo M., Gullà G., "Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in granitic rocks using GIS-based statistical methods: the contribution of the weathering grade map", Landslides. 15(6) (2018) 1127-1142. ## 7. قبادی م. ح.، فیروزی م.، "اهمیت توجه به مطالعات زمین‌شناسی مهندسی در مرحله بهره‌برداری از سازه‌های خطی، مطالعه موردی: آزادراه قزوین-رشت"، هجدهمین همایش زمین‌شناسی مهندسی (1393). ## 8. Firuzi M., Noorzad A., Ghobadi M.H., "Rockfall hazard assessment in the right abutment of Sefidrud dam, Gilan (Iran)"و 4th International Conference on Long-Term Behavior and Eco-Friendly Dams. (2017) 152-158. ## 9. Shahrivar H., Nadim H.,"The morphology, petting and processes of Rudbar and Fatalak landslides triggered by the 1990 Manjil-Rudbar earthquake in Iran"و M. Sc Thesis, University of Oslo, 212. ## 10. Ghobadi M.H., Firuzi M., Noorzad A.,"A large-scale landslide and related mechanism: a case study in the Qazvin–Rasht freeway, Iran", Environmental Earth Sciences, (14)(76)) 2017( 478, doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-6815-2. ## 11. http://www.mehrnews.com/news/4002045. ## 12. GRWA., (Gilan Regional Water Authority) (2016). http://www.glrw.ir/ 13. Alavi M., "Tectonostratigraphic synthesis and structural style of theAlborz mountain system in Iran", Geodynamics. (1) 21(1996)1-33. ## 14. سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور، "نقشه زمین شناسی چهار گوش تاکستان، مقیاس10000/1" (1349). ## 15. سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور، "نقشه زمین شناسی چهار گوش زنجان، مقیاس 250000/1" (1364). ## 16. سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور،"نقشه زمین شناسی چهار گوش جیرنده، مقیاس10000/1" (1349). ## 17. سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور، "نقشه زمین شناسی چهار گوش رودبار، مقیاس10000/1" (1349). ## 18. سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور،"نقشه زمین شناسی چهار گوش منجیل، مقیاس25000/1" (1396). ## 19. ASTMC170, "Standard test method for compressive strength of dimension stone", Technical Bulltein, Marble Institute of America. 1(3) (2014). ## 20. ISRM, "Commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests, suggested methods for determining water content, porosity, density, absorption and related properties and swelling and slake durability index properties", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 16 (1979) 148-156. ## 21. Anon, "The description and classification of weathered rocks for engineering purposes. Geological society working party report", The Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology. 28 (1995) 207–242. ## 22. Barton N., Choubey V., "The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice", Rock mechanics. 10 (1-2)(1977)1-54. ## 23. فریدونی. د.، "بررسی پایداری توده‌های سنگی شیب‌دار در مسیر گنجنامه _ شهرستانه" پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان. (1384). ## 24. Deere, D.U. and Miller, R.P "Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock", Technical report AFWLTR- 65- 116, A.F. Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM.(1966). ## 25. Rocscience., "Dips v6.1 graphical and statistical analysis oforientation data", Rocscience Inc, Toronto. (2008). ## 26. Escallón J.P., Wendeler C., Chatzi E., Bartelt P., "Parameter identification of rockfall protection barrier components through an inverse formulation", Engineering structures. 77 (2014) 1-16. ## 27. Guzzetti F., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P., "The influence of structural setting and lithology on landslide type and pattern", Environmental and Engineering Geoscience. 2 (4)(1996) 531-555. ##