Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

Application of 3D numerical simulation to process the plate loading test results-Beheshtabad dam as a case study

Authors
Abstract
Introduction

Rock mass deformation modulus is one of the major parameters has to be considered in the design phase of arch dams. Due to filling and discharging of reservoir and corresponding loading and unloading on the dam abutments, irreversible deformation takes place within the rock mass and consequently, increases the potential of creating a separation between dam body and abutments. Therefore, the rock mass modulus must be more than an alowable value in order to prevent arch dam failure. Regarding small core samples and lack of joints and other similar discontinuities in samples, the determined modulus through performing laboratory tests is higher than those obtained through in-situ tests. The available technique to estimate the rock mass deformation modulus is divided into two classes as direct and indirect methods. In direct methods, the rock mass deformation modulus is measured via performing in-situ tests such as plate loading test while it is estimated through empirical equations using rock mass classification and laboratory test results in indirect methods. These equations are developed based on regression analysis between the rock mass modulus calculated via in-situ tests, the rock mass classification and laboratory test results. Although application of these equations is simple and cost-effective, the results are doubtful and cannot be used in the design phase of arch dam due to the heterogeneous nature of rock mass and rock type variability. The numbers of micro-cracks which are developed after gallery excavation using drilling and blasting technique are more close to the loading plate. Thus, calculated modulus in these points is lower than reality. The displacement in the points far from loading plate was near to zero while the transmitted load which is calculated applying ASTM D4394 standard is more than reality in small galleries. Consequently, the calculated modulus was extremely larger than real values and sometimes even more than intact value. The empirical equations are site dependent and they are just applicable in sites with similar geotechnical condition. It is obvious that in-situ tests, such as plate loading, are the appropriate method in order to determine the modulus of deformation, however, due to some simplification in the data processing such as semi-infinite boundary condition, the application of numerical simulation as a data processing tool is more appropriate. In this research, the Beheshtabad dam was introduced and the geology characteristics of dam site were investigated. Applying direct and indirect methods, the rock mass modulus of dam abutments is calculated.

Material and Methods

The dam site is placed approximately at a distance of 2.7 km from the intersection of Koohrange and Beheshtabad river. In accordance with geological studies, the rocks in the site could be categorized in four units combined of Dolomite, Dolomitic Limestone, Limestone, Marl and Marly Limestone. Applying empirical equation the rock mass modulus of dam abutments is evaluated based on the laboratory test results and rock mass engineering classification systems. In addition, ASTM D4394 is applied to investigate the results of ten plate loading tests which are executed in the right and left abutments. To interpret the plate loading test results in the right abutment, a three-dimensional Fast Lagrange Analysis of Continuum (FLAC3D) model is developed.

Result and Discussion

To process the numerical simulation results, back analysis as a data processing tool is used. In this approach, the input parameters of numerical model will be changed in the way that the measured quantities by extensometers at the monitoring points are almost equal with the computed ones via numerical model at the corresponding points. Based on the sensitivity analysis carried out on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion parameters, the friction coefficient and cohesion variation do not affect the displacements calculated via numerical simulation as the more portion of gallery displacements are elastic. The error function is minimum when the rock mass modulus is 12 GPa and the horizontal to vertical stress ratio (K0) is equal to 0.5. The evaluated rock mass modulus based on the numerical simulation is two times lower than corresponding one evaluated applying empirical equation as a result of empirical equation uncertainty. Consideration of stress decrement under loading plate shows lower level of stress decrement under loading plate in ASTM D4394 compared to numerical simulation. This is why, the rock mass modulus, calculated based on ASTM D4394, increases dramatically by getting distance from the loading plate.

Conclusion

The empirical methods estimating the modulus of deformation based on rock mass classification systems tend to evaluate large value of modulus especially for the weak massive rocks.

As a result of galleries dimensions and semi-infinite boundary condition assumed in ASTM D4394, the calculated rock mass modulus increases dramatically by getting distance from loading plate. Therefore, the numerical simulation was applied to process the plate loading test results. A new normalized error function was developed based on measured displacements and the rock mass modulus in the right abutment was determined 12 GPa which is very lower than the calculated value using ASTM D 4394. Also, as a result of numerical simulation, the rock mass is uniform. The stress increment perpendicular to the loading plate was calculated applying numerical simulation which is 0-90 percent lower than those suggested by ASTM D 4394.
Keywords

1. Hoek E., Diederichs M. S., "Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 43 (2) (2006) 203-215.## 2. Zhang L., "Determination and applications of rock quality designation (RQD)", Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 8 (3) (2016) 389-397. ## 3. ذوالفقاری ع.، سهرابی بیدار ع.، ملکی جوان م.، هفتانی م.، "بررسی اثر تزریق دوغاب بر مدول تغییر شکل‌پذیری توده سنگ با ارزیابی پارامترهای سیستم Q(بررسی موردی پی سنگ سدهای بختیاری، بازفت و خرسان 2) "، نشریه زمین شناسی مهندسی، 8 (1393) 2168-2139. ## 4. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D 4394-84, "Standard test method for determining the in situ modulus of deformation of rock mass using the rigid plate loading method", ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Penn (1998). ## 5. ISRM, "The Blue Book-The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring 1974-2006", Ulusay R., Hudson J. A., (eds.), Ankara: ISRM & ISRM Turkish National Group, (2007). ## 6. İbrahim Ferid Öge, "Determination of deformation modulus in a weak rock mass by using menard pressuremeter", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 112 (2018) 238-252. ## 7. Barton N., "Rock mass classification, tunnel reinforcement selection using the Q-system", In: Proceedings of the ASTM Symposium on Rock Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes, Cincinnati, Ohio, (1987). ## 8. Barton N., "Some new Q value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 39 (2) (2002) 185-216. ## 9. Bieniawski Z. T., "Determining rock mass deformability: Experience from case histories", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 15 (5) (1987) 237-247. ## 10. Galera J. M., Alvarez Z., Bieniawski Z. T., "Evaluation of the deformation modulus of rock masses using RMR, comparison with dilatometer tests", Workshop: Underground Works under Special Conditions: Proceedings of the ISRM Workshop W1. Madrid, Spain, (2007). ## 11. Grimstad E., Barton N., "Updating the Q-System for NMT", In: International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete-Modern Use of Wet Mix Sprayed Concrete for Underground Support, Oslo, (1993). ## 12. Hoek E., Brown E. T., "Practical estimates of rock mass strength", International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 34 (8) (1997) 1165-1186. ## 13. Mehrotra V. K., "Estimation of engineering parameters of rock mass", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India, (1992). ## 14. Mitri H. S., Edrissi R., Henning J., "Finite element modeling of cable-bolted stopes in hard rock underground mines", In: Proceedings of the SME Annual Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico (1994). ## 15. Nicholson G. A., Bieniawski Z. T., "A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification", International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering, 8 (3) (1990) 181-202. ## 16. Palmstrom A., Singh R., "The deformation modulus of rock masses: Comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 16 (2) (2001) 115-131. ## 17. Read S. A. L., Richards L. R., Perrin N. D., "Applicability of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion to New Zealand greywacke rocks", In: Proceedings of The Ninth International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Paris (1999). ## 18. Sanei M., Rahmati A., Faramarzi L., Goli S., Mehinrad A., "Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus in Bakhtiary Dam Project in Iran", In: F. Hudson, Tan (Eds.), Rock Characterization, Modeling and Engineering Design Methods, Taylor & Francis Group, London, (2013). ## 19. Serafim J. L., Pereira J. P., "Consideration of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski", In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Engineering Geology and Underground Constructions, (1983). ## 20. Shen J., Karakus M., Xu C., "A comparative study for empirical equations in estimating deformation modulus of rock masses", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 32 (2012) 245-250. ## 21. Stephens R. E., Banks D. C., "Moduli for deformation studies of the foundation and abutments of the Portugues Dam-Puerto Rico", In: Rock mechanics as a guide for efficient utilization of natural resources: Proceedings of the 30th US symposium, Morgantown, Rotterdam: Balkema (1989). ## 22. Kayabasi A., Gokceoglu C., Ercanoglu M., "Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 40 (1) (2003) 55-63. ## 23. Fakhimi A., Salehi D., Mojtabai N., "Numerical back analysis for estimation of soil parameters in the Resalat Tunnel project", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 19 (1) (2004) 57-67. ## 24. Jeon Y. S., Yang H. S., "Development of a back analysis algorithm using FLAC", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 41 (1) (2004) 447-453. ## 25. Kaiser P. K., Zou D., Lang P. A., "Stress determination by back analysis of excavation-induced stress changes–a case study", Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 23 (3) (1990) 167-184. ## 26. Oreste P., "Back-analysis techniques for the improvement of the understanding of rock in underground constructions", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20 (1) (2005) 7-21. ## 27. Ravandi E. G., Rahmannejad R., Feili Monfared A. E., Ghotbi Ravandi E., "Application of numerical modeling and genetic programming to estimate rock mass modulus of deformation", International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23 (5) (2013) 733-737. ## 28. Sakurai S., Takeuchi K., "Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels", Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 16 (3) (1983) 173-180. ## 29. Sakurai S., Akutagawa S., Takeuchi K., Shinji M., Shimizu N., "Back-analysis for tunnel engineering as a modern observational method", Tunnelling Underground Space Technology, 18 (2-3) (2003) 185-196. ## 30. Ting F. X., Zhang Z., Sheng Q., "Estimating mechanical rock mass parameters relating to the Three Gorges Project permanent shiplock using an intelligent displacement back analysis method", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 37 (7) (2000) 1039-1054. ## 31. Zhang L. Q., Yue Z. Q., Yang Z. F., Qi J. X., Liu F. C., "A displacement-based back-analysis method for rock mass modulus and horizontal in situ stress in tunneling illustrated with a case study", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 21 (6) (2006) 636-649. ## 32. Bertuzzi R., "Back-analysing rock mass modulus from monitoring data of two tunnels in Sydney, Australia", Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9 (5) (2017) 877-891. ## 33. Vazaios I., Farahmand K., Vlachopoulos N., Diederichs M. S., "Effects of confinement on rock mass modulus: A synthetic rock mass modelling (SRM) study", Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10 (3) (2018) 436-456. ## 34. مهندسین مشاور زایندآب، "گزارش مکانیک سنگ سیمای طرح پروژه آب‌رسانی به فلات مرکزی ایران"، وزارت نیرو (1392). ## 35. Hoek E., Carranza-Torres C., Corkum B., "Hoek-Brown failure criterion – 2002 Edition", In: Hammah R., Bawden W., Curran J., Telesnicki M. (Eds.), Proceedings of NARMS-TAC 2002, Mining Innovation and Technology, Toronto, (2002). ## 36. Sonmez H., Gokceoglu C., Ulusay R., "Indirect determination of the modulus of deformation of rock masses based on the GSI system", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 41 (5) (2004) 849-857. ## 37. Sonmez H., Gokceoglu C., Nefeslioglu H. A., Kayabasi A., "Estimation of rock modulus: for intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 43 (2) (2006) 224-235. ## 38. Beiki M., Bashari A., Majdi A., "Genetic programming approach for estimating the deformation modulus of rock mass using sensitivity analysis by neural network", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 47 (7) (2010) 1091-1103## 39. غفرالهی م.، مهدوی س.، "گزارش آزمون بارگذاری صفحه‌ای در ساختگاه سد بهشت‌آباد"، مهندسین مشاور زایند آب، وزارت نیرو (1392). ## 40. Sheory P. R., "A theory for in situ stresses in isotropic and transversely isotropic rock", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and geomechanics, 31 (1) (1994) 23-34## 41. Palmstrom A., "RMi-a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes", PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Department of Geology, (1995). ##