Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

A Comparative Study of the Seismic Response of Soil-Nailed Walls under the Effect of Near-fault and Far-fault Ground Motions

Authors
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Yazd University
Abstract
In recent years, with the growing use of the nailing method for stabilizing excavation walls, there has been a need for a comprehensive investigation of the behavior of this method. In the previous studies, the behavior of nailed walls has been investigated in static and dynamic states and under different conditions. However, due to the different feature of near-field ground motions, it is necessary to study the effect of these motions on the behavior of the nailed walls. Near-fault ground motion is significantly affected by the earthquake record direction and the rupture mechanism. So, in this study, to compare the effects of near-field and far-field ground motions, a two-dimensional (2D) soil- nailed wall was considered. PLAXIS 2D was used for the modeling of the soil-nailed wall system. An excavation with a dimension of 10 meters in height was taken into the account. In this study, 10 records (Five fault-normal near-field ground motion records and five far-field ground motion records), were recorded on the rock and applied to the model. These ground motion records were derived from the near-fault ground motion record set used by Baker. These records were scaled to the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of 0.35g and then applied to the bottom of the finite element models. Mohr-Coulomb model was then used to describe the soil behavior, and Elasto-plastic model was employed for the nails. A damping ratio of 0.05 was considered at the fundamental periods of the soil layer. The results showed that the generated values of bending moment, shear force and axial force in nails under the effect of the near-fault ground motions were more than those in the far-ault ground motions. These values were almost equal to 23% for the maximum bending moment, 30% for the shear force, and 22% for the axial force. The created displacement under the effect of near-fault ground motions was more than that in the far-fault since a higher energy was applied to the model in the near-field ground motions during a short time (pulse-like ground motions). In contrast, in the far-fault ground motions, due to the more uniform distribution of energy during the record, such pulse-like displacements were not observed in the system response. Increasing in nail length and soil densification, decreases the displacement of the soil-nailed wall but does not change the general behavior of the soil under the effect of near-field ground motions. Based on the obtained results, for a constant PGA, there were positive correlations between the values of the maximum displacement on the top of the wall and the PGV values of near-fault ground motion records. However, the mentioned correlations were not observed in the case of far-fault ground motions.



Keywords

1. Miyata Y., Bathurst R. J., Konami T., "Evaluation of two anchor plate capacity models for MAW systems", Soils and Foundations, Vol. 51, No. 5 (2011) 885-895.## 2. Leshchinsky D., Vahedifard F., Leshchinsky B. A., "Revisiting bearing capacity analysis of MSE walls", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 34 (2012) 100-107. ## 3. Dash S. K., Bora M. C., "Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 41(2013) 26-35. ## 4. Suksiripattanapong C., Horpibulsuk S., Chinkulkijniwat A., Chai J. C., "Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in coarse-grained soils", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 36 (2013) 44-54. ## 5. Naeini S., Gholampoor N., "Cyclic behaviour of dry silty sand reinforced with a geotextile", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 42, No. 6 (2014) 611-619. ## 6. Biabani M. M., Indraratna B., "An evaluation of the interface behaviour of rail subballast stabilised with geogrids and geomembranes", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2015) 240-249. ## 7. Tatsuoka F., Tateyama M., Koseki J., Uchimura T., Geotextile-reinforced soil retaining wall and their seismic bahaviour. in Special Lecture, Proceeding of the 10th Asian Regional Conference on SMFE, Beijing. Location. ## 8. Collin J. G., Chouery-Curtis V. E., Berg R. R., "Field observations of reinforced soil structures under seismic loading", Earth Reinforcement Practice (Ochiai, Hayashi and Otani, Eds.), Balkema, Proc. Int. Symp. on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Fukuoka, Japan, Vol. 1 (1992) 223-228. ## 9. Griffiths D., Lane P., "Slope stability analysis by finite elements", Geotechnique, Vol. 49, No. 3 (1999) 387-403. ## 10. Hong Y. S., Chen R. H., Wu C.-S., Chen J. R., "Shaking table tests and stability analysis of steep nailed slopes", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5 (2005) 1264-1279. ## 11. Sheikhbahaei A. M., Halabian A. M., Hashemolhosseini S. H., "Analysis of soil nailed walls under harmonic dynamic excitations using finite difference method". In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, Calif, Volume: 5.59a (2010). ## 12. Wu J. C., Shi R., "Seismic Analysis of Soil Nailed Wall Using Finite Element Method", in Advanced Materials Research. Location: Trans Tech Publ. Vols. 535-537 (2012) 2027-2031. ## 13. Jaya V., Annie J., "An investigation on the dynamic behavior of soil nail walls", Journal of Civil Engineering and Science, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2013) 241-249. ## 14. Chavan D., Mondal G., Prashant A., "Seismic analysis of nailed soil slope considering interface effects", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 100 (2017) 480-491. ## Yazdandoust M., "Experimental study on seismic response of soil-nailed walls with permanent facing", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 98 (2017) 101-119. ## 15. Chopra A. K., Chintanapakdee C., "Comparing response of SDF systems to near‐fault and far‐fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 12 (2001) 1769-1789. ## 16. Alavi B., Krawinkler H., 2001, "Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures", John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, (2001). ## 17. Ambraseys N., Douglas J., "Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions", Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, Vol. 23, No.1 (2003) 1-18. ## 18. Moustafa A., Takewaki I., "Characterization and modeling of near-fault pulse-like strong ground motion via damage-based critical excitation method", Structural engineering & mechanics, Vol. 34, No. 6 (2010) 755-778. ## 19. Kalkan E., Kunnath S. K., "Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings", Earthquake spectra, Vol. 22, No. 2 (2006) 367-390. ## 20. Tothong P. Cornell C. A., "Structural performance assessment under near‐source pulse‐like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 7 (2008) 1013-1037. ## 21. Briaud J. L., Lim Y., "Soil-nailed wall under piled bridge abutment: simulation and guidelines", Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 123, No. 11 (1997) 1043-1050. ## 22. Joshi B., "Behavior of calculated nail head strength in soil-nailed structures", Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 129, No. 9 (2003), 819-828. ## 23. Singh V. P., Babu G. S., "2D numerical simulations of soil nail walls", Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4 (2010) 299-309. ## 24. Cakir T., Livaoglu R., "Fast practical analytical model for analysis of backfill-rectangular tank-fluid interaction systems", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 37 (2012) 24-37. ## 25. Baker J. W., "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 5 (2007) 1486-1501. ## 26. Babu G. S., Singh V. P., "Numerical analysis of performance of soil nail walls in seismic conditions", ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Vol. 45, No. (1-2) (2008) 31-40. ##