Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

Effect of Blast Loading on Stability of Ghareh Changool Ramp in Zehabad Lead and Zinc Mine

Authors
1 Imam Khomeini International University
2 M. Sc. in Zehabad Zinc and Lead Mine
Abstract
Introduction

Unsystematic execution of blasting process may result in serious damages. Blasting is a very complex process and almost all of blast designs are made based on empirical relations resulting from trial and error. In recent decades, considerable development of numerical methods has been made possible to achieve high accuracy study of blast effects on surface and subsurface structures. Among these methods are boundary element method, finite difference method and finite element method. It should be mentioned that there is currently no software which might be able to completely simulate blast process. But the UDEC software is able to simulate different aspects of this phenomenon through simplification and focusing on each aspect. Therefore, the UDEC software was selected. In the present study, the modeling has been performed for Ghareh Changool ramp of Zehabad Zinc and Lead Mine against blast loads.

Material and methods

Zehabad Ore deposit is located around 2 km south of Zehabad Village of Tarom Sofla County, 56 km to northwest of Qazvin at 49˚ 25' east longitude and 36˚ 28' north latitude.

The formation surrounding the ore deposit is generally made up of pyroclastics, lavas and sedimentary rocks of Eocene age (Karaj Formation) which have been divided into 22 stratigraphic units. Lithological composition of the tuff units are often rhyolithic to dacitic and the lava units are consisted of rhyolite, dacite and andesite.

To accomplish this study, we took rock blocks from Ghareh Changool ramp. Then, the blocks were cored in the laboratory to provide cylindrical samples for doing uniaxial compressive, triaxial, Brazilian and direct shear tests. Physical and mechanical properties of the tuff samples were determined according to ISRM standards.

In the present study, field studies were done to calculate strength parameters and properties of the joints. Based on these studies, three major joint sets were determined. In order to obtain the shear strength parameters of the joints, the cylindrical samples of andesitic tuff were molded by concrete and direct shear test was done on all of the joints according to ASTM D 4554.

Results and discussion

To simulate the complex conditions of blast process, we used the discrete element software of UDEC for numerical modeling considering the discontinuity of the medium. To do a dynamic analysis, first the model should come to equilibrium in the static state. The space considered to be modeled in the study was a horse-shoe-shaped ramp with 4 m base, 4 m height and 1.5 m arc radius which was located in rocky medium consisting of tuff. The height of overburden above the roof of the ramp was about 190 m. The dimensions of the model in UDEC was 20*20 m2. The behavioral model considered for the rock blocks and discontinuities were the elastic isotropic and surface contact of the joint (elasto-plastic) associated with Coulomb sliding failure, respectively. After defining the absorbing boundary conditions, the dynamic loads were applied to the model based on the defined time period. In mines stability and blasting process, the dynamic load resulting from the blast is often applied to a model as a pulse. By application of dynamic load and considering the other mentioned variations with respect of static analysis, the dynamic response of underground space could be estimated under vibration load of blast or earthquake. To do this, the blast impact wave was applied to the left side of the model as exponential pulse with maximum pressure of 4.41 MPa and time width of 0.7 to 7 msec. The results of the numerical modeling in static analysis indicated that no block would fall (Fig. 1). After application of the blast load, the results showed that there was no falling around the ramp (Fig. 2).

Conclusion

1. In static condition, after initial equilibrium no block was fallen into the ramp, regarding the blocks’ magnification plots, as a result the ramp was stable in the static loading.

2. In dynamic loading case, considering the displacement plots around the ramp and the low values of these displacements, as well as, magnification plot of the blocks 40 msec after the blast it can be said that no block was fallen into the ramp. Therefore the ramp was stable in the dynamic loading case and there was no need to install support system. ./files/site1/files/133/1Extended_Abstracts.pdf
Keywords

1. Gui M. W., Chien M. C., "Blast-Resistant Analysis for a Tunnel Passing Beneath Taipei Shongsan Airport–a Parametric Study", Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24 (2004) 227-248.## 2. Fan S. C., Jiao Y. Y., Zhao J., "On modelling of incident boundary for wave propagation in jointed rock masses using discrete element method", Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 31 (2004) 57-66. ## 3. Morris J. P., Rubin M.B., Blair S. C., Glenn L. A., Heuze F. E., "Simulations of underground structures subjected to dynamic loading using the distinct element method", Engineering computations, Vol. 21 (2004) 384-408. ## 4. Lu.Y., Wang .Z., Chong K., "A comparative study of buried structure in soil subjected to blast load using 2D and 3D numerical simulations", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University,Singapore (2005). ## 5. Heuze F. E., Morris J. P., "Insights into ground shock in jointed rocks and the response of structures there-in", Int. J. Rock Mech. & Mining Sci., Vol. 44 (2006) 647-676. ## 6. Jiao Y. Y., Zhang X. L., Zhao J., Q. S. Liu Q. S., "Viscous boundary of DDA for modeling stress wave propagation in jointed rock", Int. J. Rock Mech. & Mining Sci., 44 (2007) 1070-1076. ## 7. Wang Z., Li Y., Wang J. G., "Numerical analysis of blast-induced wave propagation and spalling damage in a rock plate", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., Vol. 45 (2008) 600-608. ## 8. Salmi E. F., Mortazavi A., "A Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Blast hole Delay in Rock Fragmentation", Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, London: Taylor & Francis Group (2009) 363-369. ## 9. Yang Y. U., Xie X., Wang R., "Numerical simulation of dynamic response of operating metro tunnel", Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2 (4) (2010) 373-384. ## 10. Ngo T., Mendis P., Gupta A., Ramsay J., "Blast loading and blast effects on structures-An overview", EJSE special issue: loading on structures (2007). ## 11. Olarewaju A. J., Kameswara Rao N. S. V., Mannan M. A., "Response of underground pipes due to surface blast using finite element method", University Malaysia sabah (2010). ## 12. Kumar, Matsagar V. A., Rao K. S., "Blast loading on semi buried structures with soil-structure interaction", IMPLAST 2010 conference, Rhode Island, USA (2010). ## 13. Shin J. H., Moon H. G., Chae S. E., "Effect of Blast-Induced Vibration on Exiting Tunnels in Soft Rocks", Tunn. Undergr Sp. Tech. 26 (2011) 51-61. ## 14. Jiang N., Chuanbo Z., "Blasting Vibration Safety Criterion for a Tunnel Liner Structure", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 32 (2012) 52-57. ## 15. Xia X., Li H. B., Li J. C., Liu B., Yu C., "A Case Study on Rock Damage Prediction and Control Method for Underground Tunnels Subjected to Adjacent Excavation Blasting", Tunn.Undergr. Sp. Tech, 35 (2013) 1-7. ## 16. Anirban De., "Numerical simulation of surface explosions over dry, cohesionless soil", Comput Geotech, 43 (2012) 72–9. ## 17. Buonsantia M., Leonardi G., "3-D simulation of tunnel structures under blast loading", archives of civil and mechanical engineering, 13 (2013) 128-134. ## 18. Shao Z. S., Wang X. Y., "Investigation into the effect of free surface blast-induced vibration of existing tunnel", 9th international conference on fracture & strength of solids, Korea (2013). ## 19. Chakraborty T., Larcher M., Gebbeken N., "Comparative performance of tunnel lining materials under blast loading", 3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Tunnelling and Subsurface Engineering, Ruhr University Bochum (2013). ## 20. Ghalandari S., Merufinia E.d., Pourbahram R. A., Ghalandari S. O., "Numerical study of the ynamic behavior of a rock mass under explosion load", International Journal of Current Life Sciences- Vol.4, Issue, 9 (2014) 6128-6135, September. ## 21. Haitao Yu, Zhengbo Wang, Yong Yuan, Wenting Li, "Numerical analysis of internal blast effects on underground tunnel in soils", Structure and Infrastructure Engineering (2016). ## 22. شرکت مهندسین مشاور فراپارس قشم، " گزارش بخش اول خدمات فنی و مهندسی کانسار سرب و روی زه‌آباد" (1385). ## 23. شرکت مهندسین مشاور تهران پادیر، " گزارش زمین‌شناسی- معدنی کانسار سرب و روی زه‌آباد"، سازمان زمین‌شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور (1372). ## 24. ISRM, "Laboratory and Field Testing", International journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Science & Geomechanical Abstracs (1982). ## 25. ISRM, "In: Ulusay, Hudson (Eds.), Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics", ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey (2007). ## 26. ASTM D4554, "Standard test Method for in-situ determination of direct shear strength of rock discontinuities. ## 27. Cundall P. A., "A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movement in blocky rock systems", International Symposium on Rock Mechanics, International Society of Rock Mechanic, Nancy (1971) II-8. ## 28. Cundall P. A., et al., "NESSI-Soil Structure Interaction Program for Dynamic and Static Problems", Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Report 51508-9 (1980). ## 29. Nagy N., "Nonlinear numerical modeling for the effects of surface explosions on buried reinforced concrete structures", Geomechanics and Engineering, vol.2, No.1 (2010) 1-18. ## 30. American society of civil engineers, "Protective design: Fundamentals of protectivedesign (non-unclear)", Department of the technical manual Tm5-855 (1965). ## 31. Yoon J., Jeon S., "Use of a Modified Particle-Based Method in Simulating Blast-Induced Rock Fracture", Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, London: Taylor & Francis Group, (2010) 371-380. ##