Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

 Parametric and Numerical Study on Soft Ground Improvement using Stone Column Reinforced with Geogrid 

Authors
Mehdi Jalili
Amin Zare
Mohammad Javad Shabani
10.18869/acadpub.jeg.12.4.571
Abstract
Introduction

The design engineers usually follow a specific decision-making process for optimal selection of the type of required foundation and its design. In this state, in case the surface foundation is not appropriate for the project conditions, before making any decisions about the use of deep foundations, the proper methods for optimization of the liquefied soil should be evaluated in order to compare the advantages and disadvantages of each of them with those of deep foundation, in terms of efficiency, implementation problems, costs, and finally to select the best choice. One of the best methods of soil improvement is the use of stone columns. The rationale behind the use of stone columns is the high shear strength of materials and the provision of lateral grip by surrounding soil. Therefore, the stone column can receive the load from the structure, and transfer it to the resistant layers. In the soils with low shear resistance, the lateral constraint crated by the surrounding soils is not enough for preventing the sideway buckling of the column under which is subjected to the loads. Thus, special measures should be considered for the use of stone columns in these soils. One of these methods is the use of reinforcement shelves such as geogrid and geotextile. Investigating the previous studies, the lack of evaluation of the design parameters such as the settlement ratio of the soil improved by the reinforced stone column to the geogrid, and provision of design graphs in this regard, has been revealed. Therefore, by extension of the studies conducted by Chub Basti et al. in 2011, the design graphs were provided in this regard.

Material and methods

The PLAXIS V8 Software was used for modelling the soft soil improved by the stone column. For increasing the precision of the results, the 15-knot element was used in the current study. The fine mesh was used in the models made for the analysis of the problem. For simulation of the improved soft soil with the stone column in a single cell, the modelling was implemented in a two-dimensional environment in axial symmetry conditions. In the current study, it was assumed the rigid foundation is on the improved bed. Thus, for analysis of the simulated model, a vertical strain up to 2% of the soft soil height has been applied on the ground. Also, for simulation of the soil behavior, an appropriate model of soil and parameters proportional to the materials should be allocated to the construct geometry. The non-linear stress-strain of the soil in different levels of the problem can be simulated. The number of model parameters increases with the level of problem rupture. For precise simulation, we need the proper parameters of the materials. For modeling of soft soils and stone columns, elastic-plastic model with Mohr-Coulomb rupture criterion was used. In the current study, it was assumed the soft bed is located on a very hard layer of soil. Therefore, the vertical deformation was prevented on this horizontal boundary. Also, the horizontal deformation in two vertical edges was prevented and only deformation in vertical direction was allowed. The soft bed close to saturation was considered without the determined free water level. For models with stone columns, the element of interface between the stone column and soft soil, has been used. The reason behind using this element is that the stone column rupture is of shear form and due to this, a significant shear stress is created on the common surface between the stone column and soft soil. The percentage of the replacement area is defined as the ratio of the total area of the stone columns to the total area of the non-improved area. In the current study, the percentage of the replacement area is utilized between 10 to 30%, which is used in implementation. Also, the diameter of the stone columns is from 0.6 to 1.2, in the analyses.

Results and discussion

The results of the numerical study were compared with the existing theoretical relationships provided by Poorooshasb and Meyerhof (1997), and Pulko et al. (2011). Figure 1 shows the comparison of the replacement percentage (RP) and settlement ratio (SR) in the non-reinforced state in the current study as well as theoretical relationships proposed by the previous researchers. Based on this figure, there is a difference between the results of the current study and those of Poorooshasb and Meyerhof (1997), and Pulko et al (2011). Poorooshasb and Meyerhof (1997) calculated the settlement ratio in their proposed material with the assumption of linear elasticity of the materials without consideration for plastic settlement. Therefore, the settlement of the improved soft soil with stone column, calculated by Poorooshasb and Meyerhof, would not show the real amount. However, Pulko et al. (2011), with consideration for the elastoplastic behavior of the materials, the lateral expansion of the stone column, and the primary stress of the soil around the column, provided more realistic results that correspond closely with the present study. Also, for designing the stone column, the results of its reinforcement have been also provided in the graph presented in Figure 2. Thus, by the use of these graphs, the ratio of settlement reduction can be obtained for each distance between columns and with different percentages of alternatives../files/site1/files/124/2jalili%DA%86%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%87.pdf
Keywords
soil improvement
stone column
geogrid coating
bearing capacity
settlement ratio
1. Barksdale R. D., Bachus R. C., "Design and construction of stone column", FHWA/RD-December (1983). ##2. Lee J. S., Pande G. N. "Analysis of stone column reinforced foundations", Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech (1998) 22:1001–1020. ##3. Mokhtari M., Kalantari B., "Soft soil stabilization using stone columns-A Review", Department of civil engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran (2012).## 4. Hughes J. M. O., Withers N. J., Greenwood D. A., "A field trial of reinforcing effect of stone column in soil", Proc., Ground Treatment by Deep Compaction, Institution of Civil Engineers, London (1976) 32-44. ##5. Madhav M. R., Vitkar P. P., "Strip footing on weak clay stabilized with a granular trench or pile", Can.Geotech. J (1978) 15(4) 605-609.## 6. Aboshi H., Ichimoto E., Harada K., Emoki M., "The composer-A method to improve the characteristics of soft clays by inclusion of large diameter sand columns", Proc., Int. Conf. on Soil Reinforcement (1979) E.N.P.C., 1, Paris 211-216. ##7. Greenwood D. A., "Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surfaces", Proc., Ground Engineering Conf., Institution of Civil Engineers, London (1970) 11-22.## 8. Jellali B., Bouassida M., De Buhan P., "A homogenization method for estimating the bearing capacity of soils reinforced by stone columns", Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Meth. Geomech (2005) 29(10) 989-1004.## 9. Priebe H. J., "The design of vibro replacement", Ground Eng (1995) 28(12) 31-37.## 10. ##Poorooshasb H. B., Meyerhof G. G., "Analysis of behavior of stone columns and lime columns", comput geotech 20 (1) (1997) 47-70. 11. McCabe B. A., McNeill J. A., Black J. A., "Ground Improvement Using the Vibro-Stone Column Technique", The Institution of Engineers of Ireland (2007).## 12. Isaac D. S., "Suitability of Different Materials for Stone Column Construction", M. Tech Thesis, College of engineering Trivandrum (2009). ##13. Gniel J., Bouazza A., "Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns", Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27 (2009) 167-175. ##14. Halabian A. M., Naeemifar I., Hashemolhosseini S. H., "Numerical analysis of vertically loaded rammed aggregate piers and pier groups", Ground Improvement (2012) 167-181.## 15. شعبانی م. ج.، روشن‌ضمیر م. ع.، "بررسی عددی پایداری شیروانی ماسه‌ای روی رس نرم به‌سازی شده با ستون سنگی"، مجله علمی و پژوهشی شریف، دورۀ 2.32، شمارۀ 2.3 (1395) 132-125.## 16. Murugesan s., Rajagopal k., "Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation", Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24 (2006) 349-358.## 17. Ambily A. P., Grandhi S. R., "Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis", J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE (2007) 133(4) 405-415.## 18. Zahmatkesh A., Choobbasti A. J., "Settlement evaluation of soft clay reinforced with stone columns using the equivalent secant modulus", Arab J Geisci, 5 (2010) 103-109. ##19. Deb K., Chandra S., Basudhar P. K., "Response of multilayer geosynthetic-reinforced bed resting on soft soil with stone columns", Computers and Geotechnics, 35 (2008) 323-330.## 20. Deb K., Samadhiya N. K., Namdeo J. B., "Laboratory model studies on unreinforced and geofrid-reinforced sand bed over stone column-improved soft clay", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29 (2011) 190-196. ##21. Mengfei Q., Xie Q., Cao X., Zhao W., He J., and Jin J., "Model test of stone columns as liquefaction countermeasure in sandy soils", Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering 10, No. 4 (2016) 481-487.## 22. Gniel J., Abdelmalek Bouazza A., "Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns", Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27.3 (2009) 167-175.## 23. Ghazavi M., Nazari Afshar J., "Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns", Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2013) 1-11.## 24. Hosseinpour I., Riccio M., Almeida M. S. S., "Numerical evaluation of a granular column reinforced by geosynthetics using encasement and laminated disks", Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 363-373.## 25. Tang L., Cong S., Ling X., Lu, J., Elgamal A., "Numerical study on ground ##improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics", Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015) 1-6. 26. Hosseinpour I., Almeida M., and Riccio M., "Ground improvement of soft soil by geotextile-encased columns", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement 169, no. 4 (2016) 297-305.## 27. Choobbasti A. J., Zahmatkesh A., Noorzad R., "Performance of Stone Columns in Soft Clay: Numerical Evaluation", Geotech Geol Eng. 29 (2011) 675-684. ##28. Cooper M. R., Rose A. N., "Stone column support for an embankment on deep alluvial soils", Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-geotechnical engineering (1999) 137(1) 15-25.## 29. Brinkgreve R. B., Vermeer P. A., "Plaxis-finite element code for soil and rocks analysis", Version 8. Rotterdam Brookfield: AA. Balkema (1998).## 30. Hu W., Wood D. M., Steward W., "Ground improvement using stone column foundation: results of model tests", Proc. Int. Conf. on Ground Improvement techniques, Macau (1997) 247-256.## 31. Narasimha Rao S., Madhiyan M., Prasad Y. V. S. N., "Influence of bearing area on the behavior of stone columns", Proc., Indian Geotech. Conf., Calcutta, India (1992) 235-237.## 32. Christian J. T, Carrier W. D., Janbu Bjerrum and Kjaernsli’s chart reinterpreted. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15 (1978) 123-128.## 33. Elshazly H., Elkasabgy M., Elleboudy A., "Effect of Inter-Column Spacing on Soil Stresses due to Vibro-Installed Stone Columns: Interesting Findings", Geotech Geol Eng. 26 (2008) 225-236.## 34. Pulko B., Majes B., & Logar J., "Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29 (1) (2011) 29-39. ##