Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

Forward and Inverse Modeling of GPR Data to use in Snow, Ice and Glaciological, A Case Study: Alam Kuh Glacier, Mazandaran Province

Authors
1 Shahrood University of Technology
2 Arak University of Technology
Abstract
Introduction

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method is a pretty new, non-destructive and high-resolution geophysical method that is widely used to identify the thickness of snow and ice layers and glaciers bed, because snow and ice are transparent for electromagnetic (EM) waves. Therefore, this method has been used to determine the thickness and basement topography of Alam-kooh glacier. In this research, only the GPR acquired data using unshielded antenna with central frequency of 25 MHz along one line in Alam-kuh glacier, Kelardasht- Mazandaran, have been processed and interpreted. The GPR data acquisition has been done by using common offset method, and transmitter-receiver separation of 6 meters. The final real radargram related to one of the surveyed GPR profiles in this region has been prepared after applying various processing operations containing signal saturation correction, amplitude gain, f-k migration filtering and static (topography) correction on the raw data. After applying processing sequences on the acquired data, the EM waves reflection off the interfaces of different layers including the reflections from the glacier basement have been detected, and by assigning a suitable EM wave velocity in the ice (0.16 m/ns), the thickness of 50 m for the ice layer laid under the survey line has been estimated. Also, in present research, forward and inverse modeling of GPR data have been performed to employ for snow, ice and glaciological investigations in the AlamKooh region of Mazandaran. To achieve this goal, GPR response of synthetic model corresponding to the real radargram was simulated first, by 2-D finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method. Afterward the inversion method by solving an optimization problem was employed to validate the interpretation of real GPR data.

Methodology and Approaches

Based on the nature, physical and geometric properties of the subsurface target in the field data, their synthetic model have been built and their two-dimensional GPR responses forward modeling using ReflexW software and finite difference algorithms improved in the frequency domain, have been obtained. Also, it has been used an effective algorithm, coded in GUI environment of MATLAB programming software and as a result, a reliable and accurate inverse modeling has been carried out. In the present study, to simulate the behavior of the propagation of EM waves in GPR method, two-dimensional finite difference method has been used. The main advantage of this method is its comparative simplicity of the concept, high accuracy and simple implementation for complex and arbitrary models as well as easily adjusting the antenna when applied. In this study, acquisition of GPR field data and synthetic data modeling have been carried out in TM mode. The radargrams of the GPR data have been demonstrated using ReflexW software after performing necessary processing sequences.

Results and Conclusions

The obtained results reveal that moraine materials covering the surface of the area are mainly fine-grained granite. The bed-rock or basement in the area is also granite. The polarity representing ice-bed rock is clearly seen on the GPR profiles. The topography of the glacier basement has successfully been detectable using just by GPR method. The electrical resistive nature of the glacier has caused large penetration depth of GPR pulses in this research. Furthermore, the results of the research for presented profiles on the basis of forward and inverse modeling output of GPR data in comparison with real GPR radargrams in the region validated the accuracy of GPR investigations in the area. Although with a quick glance, the error obtained by the inverse modeling for real GPR data seems unexpected and unacceptable, absolutely the high rate of error depends on many factors influencing on the real earth models containing various limitations existing in all forward modeling algorithms and software packages, impossibility of making forward modeling exactly according to the real models (due to the complex nature of the ground), taking into account the homogeneity and uniform host environment and targets in the modeling process unlike the diversity, the presence of different types of noises and so on. Therefore, making a controlled geophysical test site and trying performance of inverse modeling algorithm for field GPR data in this site, as well as determining the important physical parameters such as dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity by experimental method through sampling from different depths for complex geological environments are suggested../files/site1/files/124/1ahmadpur%DA%86%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%87.pdf
Keywords

1. صداقت م.، معماریان ح.، "زمین‌شناسی فیزیکی"، جلد 1، چاپ 6، (1369) 413-435. ##2. وزیری ف.، "هیدرولوژی کاربردی در ایران (شناسایی یخچال های طبیعی در ایران)"، جلد دوم، چاپ اول، سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی کشور، معاونت امور پشتیبانی، مرکز مدارک علمی و انتشارات، تهران (1382) 104-108. ##3. Eder K., Reidler C., Mayer C., Leopold M., "Crevasse detection in Alpien areas using ground penetrating radar as a component for a mountain gulde system", The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf. Sci., 37 (2008) 838-839.## 4. Hagg w., Mayer c., Lambrecht A. Kriegel D., "Glacier changes in the Big Naryn basin", Central Tian Shan, Global and Planetary Change. in press (2012).## 5. Barnett T. P., Adam J. C., Lettenmaier D. P., "Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow dominated regions", Nature, 438 (7066) (2005) 303-309. ##6. ولدان زوج م. ج.، رضایی ی.، وزیری ف.، مباشری م. ر.، "بررسی یخچال طبیعی علم‌چال با استفاده از تصاویر ماهواره‌ای KNTU"، شمارۀ 70، دوره 18، (1386) 3-4.## 7. Lrvine-Fynn T. D. L., Moorman B. J., Williams J. L. M., Walter F. S. A, "Seasonal changes in Ground penetrating radar signature observed at a polythermal glacier", Bylot Island, Canada, Earth Surface processes and Landforms., 31, 7 (2006) 892-909.## 8. Kennett, P., "Reconnaissance gravity and magnetic surveys of part of the Larsen ice shelf and adjacent mainland", British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 8 (1966) 49-62.## 9. Crossley D. J., Clarke G. K. C., "Gravity Measurements on “Fox Glacier”, Yukon Territory", Canada, Journal of Glaciology, 9 (1970) 363-374. ##10. Bose R. N., Dutta N. P., Lahiri S. M., "Refraction Seismic Investigation at Zemu Glacier", Sikkim, Journal of Glaciology, 10 (1971) 113-119.## 11. Hubbard B., Glasser N., "Field techniques in glaciology and glacial geomorphology", John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester: UK, 400 (2005).## 12. Gibas J., Rachlewicz G., Szczucinski W., "Application of DC resistivity soundings and geomorphological surveys in studies of modern Arctic glacier marginal zones", Petuniabukta, Spitsbergen, Polish Polar Reserch., 26, 4 (2005) 239-258. ##13. Reynolds J. M., "The role of geophysics in glacial hazard assessment", First Break, 24 (9) (2006) 61-66.## 14. David E., James W., David R., "Shallow seismic surveys and ice thickness estimates of the Mullins Valley debris-covered glacier", McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica, Antarctic Science., 19 (2007) 485-496. ##15. Angelopoulos M. C., Pollard W. H., Couture N. J., "The application of CCR and GPR to characterize ground ice conditions at Parsons Lake, Northwest Territories, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85 (-2013) 22-33.## 16. Apparao A., "Development in geoelectrical methods", Balkema (-1997).## 17. Stern W., "Versucheiner elektrodynamischen dickenmessung von gletschereis", Gerl. Beitr. Zur Geophysik., 23 (1929) 292-333.## 18. Watson M. I., Yelf R. J., Bertler N. A N., "Bedrock topography and Isochrone mapping of five glaciers in Victoria Land", Antarctica, 12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (2008). ##19. Binder D., Bruckl E., Roch K. H., Behm M., Schoner W., Hynek B., "Determination of total ice volume and ice-thikness distribution of tow glaciers in the Hohe Tauern region", Eastern Alps, from GPR data, Annals of Glaciology., 50, 51, (2009) 71-79. ##20. Previati M., Godio A., Ferraris, S., "Validation of spatial variability of snowpack thickness and density obtained with GPR and TDR methods, J. of. Applied Geophysics., 75, (2011) 284-293.## 21. Robin G. D. Q., Evans S., Bailey J. T., "Interpretation of radio echo sounding in polar ice sheets", Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 265 (1969) 437-505.## 22. Bauder A., Funk M., Gudmundsson G. H., "The ice-thickness distribution of Unteraargletscher", Switzerland, Ann. Glaciol., 37 (2003) 331-336. ##23. Brandt O., Langley K., Kohler J., Hamran S. E., "Detection of buried ice and sediment layers in permafrost using multi-frequency Ground Penetrating Radar: A case examination on Svalbard", Remote Sensing of Environment., 111, 2 (2007) 213-226.## 24. Singh S. K., Rathore B. P., Bahuguna I. M., Ramnathan A. L., "Estimation of glacier ice thickness using Ground Penetrating Radar in the Himalayan Region", Current Science., 103, 1, ( 2012) 68-73. ##25. Heilig A., Eisen O., Schneebeli M. "Temporal observations of a seasonal snowpack using upward-looking GPR, Hydrol. Process., 24 (2010) 3133-3145. ##26. Machguth H., Eisen O., Paul F., Hoelzle M., "Strong spatial variability of snow accumulation observed with helicopter-borne GPR on two adjacent Alpine glaciers", Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 (2006) L13503.## 27. Sold L., Huss M., Hoelzle M., Andereggen H., Joerg P. C., Zemp M., "Methodological approaches to infer end-of-winter snow distribution on alpine glaciers", J. Glaciol., 59 (2013) 1047-1059.## 28. Helfricht K., Kuhn M., Keuschnig M., Heilig A., "Lidar snow cover studies on glaciers in the Ötztal Alps (Austria): comparison with snow depths calculated from GPR measurements", The Cryosphere, 8 (2014) 41-57.## 29. Arcone S. A., Spikes V. B., Hamilton G. S., Mayewski P. A., "Stratigraphic continuity in 400 MHz short-pulse radar profiles of firn in West Antarctica", Ann. Glaciol., 39 (2004)195-200.##30. Huybrechts P., Rybak O., Steinhage D., Pattyn F., "Past and present accumulation rate reconstruction along the Dome Fuji-Kohnen radio-echo sounding profile", Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 50 (2009) 112-120. ##31. Azam M. F, Wagnon P., Ramanathan A., Vincent C., Sharma P., Arnaud Y., Linda A., Pottakkal J. G., Chevallier P., Singh V. B., Berthier E., "Form balance to imbalance: A shift in the dynamic behaviour of Chhota Shigri glacier", western Himalaya, India, Journal of Glaciology,5:208 (2012) 315-324. ##32. Miège C., Forster R. R., Box J. E., Burgess E. W., Mc-CONNELL J. R., Pasteris D. R., Spikes V. B., "Southeast Greenland high accumulation rates derived from firn cores and ground-penetrating radar", Ann. Glaciol., 54 (2013) 322-332. ##33. Hawley R. L., Courville Z. R., Kehrl L. M., Lutz E. R., Osterberg E. C., Overly T. B., Wong G. J., "Recent accumulation variability in northwest Greenland from ground-penetrating radar and shallow cores along the Greenland Inland Traverse", J. Glaciol., 60 (2014) 375-382.##34. Fischer A., Span N., Kuhn M., Helfricht K., Stocker-Waldhuber M., Seiser B., Massimo M., Butschek M., "Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) point measurements of ice thickness in Austria. Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (2015). ##35. Li T., Zhao J., Jiao Y., Hou J., Mu L., "Regional characteristics of sea ice thickness in Canadian shelf and Arctic Archipelago measured by Ground Penetrating Radar", Acta Oceanol Sin., 2015, Vol. 34, No. 5 (2015) 110-116. ##36. Sinisalo A., Fujita K., Gustafsson J., Fukuda T., Joshi Sh., Stumm D., and Shea J., "Ice thickness and thermal structure of a high altitude Himalayan glacier", Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 18 (2016) EGU2016-11636.## 37. Blindow N., Eisenburger D., Illich B., Petzold H., Richter T., "Ground penetrating radar, In Environmental Geology (Eds K.Knödel, G.Lange and H.-J.Voigt) (2007) 283-335, Springer. ##38. Parasnis D. S., "Principles of applied geophysics", 5th edition, Chapman and Hall (1997).## 39. Neal A., "Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress", Earth-science Reviews., 66 (2004) 261-330. ##40. Van Overmeeren R. A., "Georadar for hydrogeology", First break, 8 (1994) 401-4081. ##41. Milsom J., Field Geophysics, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, (2003) 168-174. ##42. Jol H. M., "Ground Penitrating Radar: Theory and Applications", Oxford: Elsevier Science (2009) 508.## 43. پرنو س.، پایان‌نامه ارشد:"پردازش، مدل‌سازی و تفسیر داده‌های GPR به‌منظور تعیین عمق، ضخامت و محدودۀ جانبی یخچال‌ها در منطقه علم‌کوه مازندران"، دانشکده مهندسی معدن، نفت و ژئوفیزیک، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود (1393).## 44. Tzanis A., "MatGPR Release 2: A freeware MATLAB package for the analysis & interpretation of common and single offset GPR data, FastTimes, 15(1) )2010( 17-43. ##45. Karimi N., Farokhnia A., Shishangosht S., Elmi M., Eftekhari M., Ghalkhani H., "Elevation changes of Alamkouh glacier in Iran since 1955, based on remote sensing data", International J. of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation., 19 (2012 a) 45-58. ##46. Daniels D. J., "Ground penetrating radar, The Institution of Electrical Engineers", The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Londo,United Kingdom (2004) 75-84 and 455-460.## 47. Palli A., "Polythrmal glacier studies in Svalbard determined by ground penetrating radar", Departmant of geosciences university of oulu, (2003) 15-17. ##48. Annan ‌A. P., "Ground penetrating radar workshop notes", Sensors and software Inc,Mississauga, ON, Canada (2001). ##