Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology

Investigating the Effect of Sample Preparation Method and Plastic Fines Content on the Static and Cyclic Behavior of Clayey Sands

Authors
Abstract
of initial texture and plastic fine content has been investigated. In order to model the different deposition condition four different specimen preparation methods are used. The tests are conducted on sands and its combination with to 25 fine percent using static and cyclic method. Four different specimen preparation methods are used consisting of Dry Funnel Deposition (DFD), Water Sedimentation (WS), Moist Tamping (MT) and Air Pluviation (AP). Each method may be useful to model the behavior of some special deposited soils. For example, DFD is the best method to model the natural deposition of silty sands, while the WS method is suitable for simulating the sands natural deposition in the rivers. MT method is the best method to simulate the behavior of compacted embankments while SD method is suitable to prevent the segregation of particles with respect to other methods like Water Pluviation. Effect of sample preparation methods on the sands and silty sands behavior is investigated to some extent, while the clayey sands are rarely considered. The results show that water sedimentation method, Air pluviation method and Dry funnel deposition method tends to create dilative textures with continuous dilative behavior even in high clay fine content. In contrast, the wet tamping method shows the dilative behavior only for clean sands specimens and increasing fines will results in instability and complete strain softening behavior. In cyclic loading the difference between different methods are less with respect to static loading. It seems that the results of different methods tends to be identical with increasing in fine content. In general, increasing fine content up to 20 percent results in more instability. After that a threshold value can be estimated bout 2 percent, after that the instability becomes less with continuous increase in fines content. The valuable result is that the threshold value is not dependent on the specimen preparation method or initial texture of specimens.
Keywords

1. Bray J. D., et.al.," Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in adapazari, turkey", Journal Of Geotechnical and Geo environmental Eng., 130(7), (2004a) 673-685 2. Chu D. B., et al., "Documentation of soil conditions at liquefaction and non liquefaction sites from 1999 chi-chi (Taiwan) earth quake", Soil Dyn. Earth quake Eng., 24 (9-10) (2004) 647-657 3. Boulanger R, Meyers M, Mejia L, Idriss I, "Behavior of a fine grained soil during Loma Prieta earthquake", Can Geotech J 35 (1998) 146-158 4. Park Sung-Sik, Kim Young-Su, "Liquefaction Resistance of Sands Containing Plastic Fines with Different Plasticity", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, doi:10.1061/ (ASCE)GT. 1943-5606.0000806 (2012). 5. Gratchev I. B. et al, "Undrained cyclic behavior of bentonite-sand mixtures and factors affecting it", Geotech Geol Eng 25, (2007) 349-367 6. Derakhshandi M., et al, "The effect of plastic fines on the pore pressure generation characteristics of saturated sands", Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 28, (2008) 376-386. 7. Abouzar Sadrekarimi, Scott, Olson M., "Effect of Sample-Preparation Method on Critical-State Behavior of Sands", Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 35, No. 4, Paper ID GTJ104317 (2012). 8. Yao-Chung Chen, Jiun-Chi Chuang, "Effects of Fabric on Steady State and Liquefaction Resistance", Proceedings of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Stavanger, Norway, June 17-22 (2001). 9. Yamamuro J. A., Wood F. M., "Effect of depositional method on the undrained behavior and microstructure of sand with silt", Soil Dynamics and EarthquakeEngineering, 24:751,760.doi:10.1016/j. soildyn. 2004. 06. 004 (2004). 10. Papadimitriou A. G., Dafalias Y. F., Yoshimine M., "Plasticity modeling of the effects of sample preparation method on sand response", Soils Found. 45, No. 2 (2005) 109-123. 11. Murthy T. G., Loukidis D., Carraro J. A. H., Prezzi M., Salgado R., "Undrained monotonic response of clean and silty sands", Geotechnique, 57(3), (2007) 273-288. 12. Fletcher M., Wood, Jerry A., Yamamuro, Poul V. Lade, "Effect of depositional method on the undrained response of silty sand", Can. Geotech. J. 45 (2008) 1525-1537 13. Murthy G. et al, "UNDRAINED RESPONSE OF CLEAN AND SILTY SANDS, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics", San Diego, California (2010) 14. Pathak S. R., Dalvi R. S., "Effect of Sample Preparation Method on Liquefaction of Sandy Soil", EJGE Journal, Vol. 16 (2011) 1411-1426 15. Vaid Y. P., Kuerbis R., "Sand Sample Preparation-The Slurry Deposition Method", Journal of Soils and Foundations, 28(4) (1988) 107-118. 16. Yasrobi S. S., "Investigating the Effects of Content and Shapes of Fines on Steady State Behavioural Properties of Saturated Sands to Assess Liquefaction Potential in Such Soils", PhD Thesis, Civil Engineering School, Sharif University of Technology (1997). 17. Ishihara K., "Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes", Geotechnique, VOL43,No.3 (1993) 351-415 18.Vaid Y. P., Sivathayalan S., Stedman D., "Influence of specimen-reconstituting method on the undrained response of sands. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 22(3), (1999) 187-195. 19. Vaid Y. P., Negussey D., "Preparation of Reconstituted Sand Specimens", Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977 (1988) 405-417. 20. Oda, Masanobu, "Deformation Mechanism of Sand in Triaxial Compression Test", SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, Vol. 12, No. 4, (1972) 45-63. 21. Oda M., "The Mechanism of Fabric Changes during Compressional deformation of sand", Journal of Soils and Foundations, 12(2) (1972) 1-18. 22. Naeemifar O., Yasrobi S., "The effect of depositional method on the stress strain bahaviour of clayey sands", Modares journal, Vol.13, No.3, (2013). 23. Seed H. B., Lee K. L., "Liquefaction of Saturated Sands During cyclic loading", Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE 92 (1966) 105-134.