Journal of Engineering Geology
نشریه زمین شناسی مهندسی
Journal of Engineering Geology
Basic Sciences
http://jeg.khu.ac.ir
1
admin
2228-6837
2981-1600
doi
fa
jalali
1399
10
1
gregorian
2021
1
1
14
4
online
1
fulltext
fa
بررسی تأثیر ویژگیهای زمینشناسی مهندسی سنگدانههای کربناته روی ویژگیهای سنگهای مصنوعی
The Influence of Engineering Geological Properties of Carbonate Aggregates on Artificial Stone Properties
زمین شناسی مهندسی
En. Geology
مقاله پژوهشی
Original Research
<span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">هدف</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">این</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">تحقیق</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">بررسی</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">تأثیر ویژگی­های</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">زمین­شناسی</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">مهندسی</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">سنگ­دانه­های</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">کربناته روی</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">ویژگی­های</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">سنگ­های مصنوعی</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">با</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">سیمان غیررزینی و سپس مقایسه ویژگی­های مهندسی سنگ­های مصنوعی ساخته شده با سنگ­های طبیعی است. در این تحقیق بهمنظور بررسی تأثیر ویژگی­های سنگ­دانه­های کربناته بر سنگ­مصنوعی از 7 نمونه سنگ ساختمانی</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">شامل سنگ­چینی (مرمریت ریزبلور)، مرمر کریستال (مرمریت درشت بلور)، مرمریت (نهان بلور)، سنگ آهک سیاه، 2 نمونه تراوراتن و انیکس استفاده شده است. از این نمونه­های سنگی، ویژگی­های زمین­شناسی مهندسی نمونه­ها تعیین شد. پس از طراحی قالب برای ساخت سنگ­مصنوعی، سنگ­دانه­هایی با دانه­بندی و طرح اختلاط یکسان تهیه و برای تمامی سنگ­دانه­ها با شرایط</span></span><span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;"> ویبره، فشار و خلأ یکسان، دو نمونه سنگ­مصنوعی درشتدانه و ریزدانه ساخته ­شده است.</span></span> <span style="font-family:B Lotus;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">بعد از ساخت، اقدام به انجام آزمایش­های فیزیکی، مقاومتی و دوام شد و سپس نتایج حاصل مقایسه شد. بررسی نتایج پارامترهای مهندسی نشان داد سنگ­های مصنوعی تراورتن حجت­آباد دارای کیفیت مهندسی مشابه نسبت به سنگ طبیعی خود دارند. سنگ­های مصنوعی مرمر و تراورتن توران­پشت حدود 11 تا 32 % افزایش کیفیت و ولی سنگ­های مصنوعی سنگ­چینی، آهک سیاه، انیکس و مرمریت حدود 6 تا 33 % کاهش کیفیت نسبت به سنگ طبیعی خود دارند نمونه­های تولید شده از این سنگ­ها نیز اگر­چه از نظر پارامترهای مقایسه­ای سنگ­مصنوعی کمتر از سنگ طبیعی است اما در محدودۀ قابل قبول بهعنوان مصالح ساختمانی قرار می­گیرند. </span></span><br>
<br>
<strong>Abstract</strong><br>
This study aimed at evaluating the effect of calcic aggregates of engineering geological properties on the artificial stones properties, non-resin cemented and then, to make a comparison between the engineering properties of artificial and natural stones. To investigate the effect of calcic aggregates properties on artificial stones, seven samples of building stones including black limestone, three samples of marble (Chinese stone, marble and crystalline marble) and two samples of travertine and onix were used. Engineering geological properties of the samples were then determined. In the next stage, after designing mould for constructing artificial stones, aggregates with the same grading and mixture design were provided. Then two samples including coarse and fine grained artificial stones were made for all of the mentioned aggregates under the same vibration, pressure and vacuum conditions. Next physical, strength and durability tests were conducted, and the obtained results were compared. The results of engineering parameters showed that Hojjat Abad travertine artificial stones have similar engineering quality to own natural stone and Crystaline Marble and Turan Posht travertine artificial rocks have about 11 to 32% increase in quality but Chinese stone, Black limestone, onix and marble have a 6 to 33% lower quality than own natural stone. However, the samples made of other stones in view of the compared parameters related to artificial stones have lower quality than natural stones; however, they are placed in the acceptable range as building materials.<br>
<strong>Introduction</strong><br>
Given the variation of construction materials, the importance of the economy in its supply and large use of natural stone mines and the production of seemingly unusable slags, it is necessary to reuse these slags. One of these reusing methods is to make artificial stones and its application as construction materials. Rock powder, aggregate, a small amount of cement or resin and other chemicals are used for producing artificial stone. In this study, carbonate minerals, rock powder and white cement in the first phase are mixed and wet. Then, in the next stage, to form the sample in a cubic mold, they have been compacted under three physical processes of vibration, vacuum and pressure. The aim of this study is to investigate how to make artificial stone, to evaluate the engineering properties of artificial rock and the effect of limestone engineering properties on artificial stone properties of non -resin cement and then comparing the properties of artificial rocks made with natural stones<span dir="RTL"></span><br>
<strong>Material and methods</strong><br>
In this study, in order to investigate the effect of calcic aggregates properties on artificial stone properties, seven samples of building carbonate rocks including crystalline marble, two samples of marble, black limestone, and two samples of travertine and onix were used.<span dir="RTL"></span><br>
<a name="_Hlk44064908">Engineering geological </a>properties of the used samples were then determined. In the next stage, after designing mold for constructing artificial stones, aggregates with the same grading and mixture design were provided. Then two samples including coarse and fine grained artificial stones were made for all of the mentioned aggregates under the same vibration, pressure and vacuum conditions. After construction, physical, strength and durability tests were conducted, and then the results were compared.<span dir="RTL"></span><br>
<strong>Results and discussion</strong><br>
Investigation of the effect of engineering geological properties of carbonate aggregate on artificial stone properties showed that the artificial stones made of travertine aggregates have higher quality than natural travertine in terms of physical, strength and durability properties. Due to the existence of pores on the surface of travertine aggregates, the used cement can result in reducing effective porosity and increasing strength and durability in the artificial stones.<span dir="RTL"></span><br>
In Table 1 a proposed research has been used for rating rock engineering parameters based on the degree of importance for building stones. Then, according to this table, the score of each natural stone and related artificial stones were determined. For building stones, the importance of durability and strength is more than the density. Also, the density shows its effect on durability. At the same time, with increasing the percentage of water absorption, the durability of rock has decreased. Therefore, the rocks with less water absorption are more important.<br>
<strong>Table 1. Scoring of building stones based on the engineering parameters<span dir="RTL"></span></strong>
<table align="center" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width:442px;" width="442">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="width:135px;height:19px;">Parameters</td>
<td style="width:77px;height:19px;">Description</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:19px;">Excellent</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:19px;">Good</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:19px;">Marginal</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:19px;">Poor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:77px;height:24px;">Total score</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:24px;">100</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:24px;">75</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:24px;">50</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:24px;">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="width:135px;height:9px;">Water absorption (%)</td>
<td style="width:77px;height:9px;">Range</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:9px;">0-2</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:9px;">2-3</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:9px;">3-5</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:9px;">>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:77px;height:7px;">Score</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:7px;">25</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:7px;">20</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:7px;">15</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:7px;">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="width:135px;height:11px;">Unit weight (kN/m<sup>3</sup>)</td>
<td style="width:77px;height:11px;">Range</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:11px;">>24</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:11px;">22-24</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:11px;">18-22</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:11px;"><18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:77px;height:10px;">Score</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:10px;">15</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:10px;">10</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:10px;">5</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:10px;">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="width:135px;height:10px;">Uniaxial compressive strength (MPa)</td>
<td style="width:77px;height:10px;">Range</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:10px;">>50</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:10px;">40-50</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:10px;">30-40</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:10px;"><30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:77px;height:6px;">Score</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:6px;">20</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:6px;">15</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:6px;">10</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:6px;">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="width:135px;height:11px;">Tensile strength (MPa)</td>
<td style="width:77px;height:11px;">Range</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:11px;">>20</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:11px;">15-20</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:11px;">10-15</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:11px;"><10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:77px;height:11px;">Score</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:11px;">20</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:11px;">15</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:11px;">10</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:11px;">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="width:135px;height:9px;">Durability (%)</td>
<td style="width:77px;height:9px;">Range</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:9px;"><1%</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:9px;">1%-2%</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:9px;">2%-3%</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:9px;">>3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:77px;height:2px;">Score</td>
<td style="width:65px;height:2px;">20</td>
<td style="width:55px;height:2px;">15</td>
<td style="width:63px;height:2px;">10</td>
<td style="width:47px;height:2px;">4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>The total score of fine<span dir="RTL">-</span>grained artificial stones (65%) is almost similar, indicating that the type of carbonate grains does not affect the characteristics of fine<span dir="RTL">-</span>grained artificial stones, but the total score of coarse artificial grains are in the range of 58 to 74%<span dir="RTL">.</span> This range of score indicates that structural weakness, especially the cleavage surface, porosity, lamination, vein and acetylolite of aggregates have more influence on engineering properties in coarse-grained artificial rock<span dir="RTL">.</span><br>
<strong>Conclusion</strong><br>
Comparison between the engineering properties of artificial and natural stones were studied. The following conclusions were drawn:<br>
<span dir="RTL">-</span> The artificial stones of Hojjatabad travertine have similar engineering quality with their natural stone.<br>
- Both Crystaline marble and Turan Posht travertine artificial rocks have about 11 to 32% increase in quality but Chinese stone, black limestone, onix and marble have 6 to 33% decrease in quality compared to natural stone but in acceptable ranges when they are considered as construction materials.<span dir="RTL"></span><br>
- The samples made of other rock samples have lower quality than natural stones; however, they are placed in the acceptable range as building materials.<a href="./files/site1/files/144/Mirjalili.pdf">./files/site1/files/144/Mirjalili.pdf</a><br>
ویژگی های زمین شناسی مهندسی, سنگ ساختمانی, سنگمصنوعی, سنگدانه, کربناته.
Building stone, Artificial stone, Aggregate, Calcic, Engineering Geological properties
749
776
http://jeg.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1724-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
Tayebeh
Mirjalili
طیبه
میرجلیلی
mirjalilitayebeh@gmail.com
10031947532846004879
10031947532846004879
No
Tarbiat Modares University,Thran,Iran
دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، گروه زمین شناسی مهندسی
Mashala
Khamechian
ماشاله
خامه چیان
khamechm@modares.ac.ir
10031947532846004880
10031947532846004880
Yes
Tarbiat Modares University,Thran,Iran
دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، گروه زمین شناسی مهندسی
Mohammadreza
Nikudel
محمدرضا
نیکودل
nikudelm@modares.ac.ir
10031947532846004881
10031947532846004881
No
Tarbiat Modares University,Thran,Iran
دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، گروه زمین شناسی مهندسی