Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S. Y., and Nadri, A. 2023. The effects of influence radius and drawdown cone on the areas related to the protection of water wells. Journal of Hydrology, 617, 129001.
Ahmadi, A., Mirzavand, G., and Zebarjad, M. 2023. The drawdown cone of influence zone in water wells in unconfined alluvial aquifers and the influence of physical parameters of the aquifer on it [Original Research]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 17(3), 299-320.
Barry, D., Parlange, J.-Y., and Li, L. 2000. Approximation for the exponential integral (Theis well function). Journal of Hydrology, 227, 287 - 291.
Bear, J. 2012. Hydraulics of groundwater. Courier Corporation.
Bresciani, E., Shandilya, R. N., Kang, P. K., and Lee, S. 2020. Well radius of influence and radius of investigation: What exactly are they and how to estimate them? Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124646.
Cooper Jr, H., and Jacob, C. E. 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical :union:, 27(4), 526-534.
Darcy, H. 1856. Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon: Exposition et application des principes à suivre et des formules à employer dans les questions de distribution d'eau (Vol. 2). V. Dalmont.
Dragoni, W. 1998. Some considerations regarding the radius of influence of a pumping well. Hydrogéologie (Orléans)(3), 21-25.
Dupuit, J. E. 1863. Études théoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux découverts et à travers les terrains perméables. Dunod, Paris, 352 pp.
ITES. 2014. Guideline for determining the quantitative zone of wells and qanats (Iran's technical and executive system, Issue 419).
Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, Sorab, and Provost, A.M. 2017. Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap.
Louwyck, A., Vandenbohede, A., Libbrecht, D., Van Camp, M., and Walraevens, K. 2022. The Radius of Influence Myth. Water, 14(2), 149.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model (Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey Issue book 6, chap. A1).
Moench, A. F. 1997. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer. Water Resources Research, 33(6), 1397-1407.
Neuman, S. P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research, 8(4), 1031-1045.
Neuman, S. P. 1974. Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 10(2), 303-312.
Remini, B., Kechad, R., and Achour, B. 2014. The collecting of groundwater by the qanats: a millennium technique decaying. LARHYSS Journal P-ISSN 1112-3680/E-ISSN 2521-9782(20).
Theis, C. V. 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical :union:, 16(2), 519-524.
Thiem, G. 1906. Hydrologische Methoden: Leipzig, Germany. JM Gebhardt, 56p.
Vatankhah, A. R. 2014. Full-range solution for the Theis well function. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(3), 649-653.
Winston, R. B. 2019. ModelMuse Version 4: a graphical user interface for MODFLOW 6. Scientific Investigations Report-US Geological Survey(2019-5036).
Zhai, Y., Cao, X., Jiang, Y., Sun, K., Hu, L., Teng, Y., Wang, J., and Li, J. 2021. Further discussion on the influence radius of a pumping well: A parameter with little scientific and practical significance that can easily be misleading. Water, 13(15), 2050.
