Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S. Y., Nadri, A. 2022. The effects of aquifer and well parameters on Capture Zone and Discharge Zone in alluvial unconfined aquifers [Original Research]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 16(2), 180-207. https://doi.org/10.22034/jeg.2023.16.2.1019241
Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S. Y., Nadri, A. 2023. The effects of influence radius and drawdown cone on the areas related to the protection of water wells. Journal of Hydrology, 617, 129001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129001
Barrash, W., Dougherty, M. E. 1997. Modeling axially symmetric and nonsymmetric flow to a well with MODFLOW, and application to Goddard2 well test, Boise, Idaho. Groundwater, 35(4), 602-611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00125.x
Barry, D., Parlange, J.-Y., Li, L. 2000. Approximation for the exponential integral (Theis well function). Journal of Hydrology, 227, 287 - 291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00184-5
Bresciani, E., Shandilya, R. N., Kang, P. K., Lee, S. 2020. Well radius of influence and radius of investigation: What exactly are they and how to estimate them? Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124646
Cooper Jr, H., Jacob, C. E. 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 27(4), 526-534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/TR027i004p00526
Darcy, H. 1856. Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon: Exposition et application des principes à suivre et des formules à employer dans les questions de distribution d'eau (Vol. 2). V. Dalmont. https://doi.org/http://books.google.com
Dragoni, W. 1998. Some considerations regarding the radius of influence of a pumping well. Hydrogéologie (Orléans)(3), 21-25.
Dupuit, J. E. 1863. Études théoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux découverts et à travers les terrains perméables. Dunod, Paris, 352 pp.
Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, Sorab, and Provost, A.M. 2017. Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A55, 197 p. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A55
Louwyck, A., Vandenbohede, A., Libbrecht, D., Van Camp, M., Walraevens, K. 2022. The Radius of Influence Myth. Water, 14(2), 149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020149
McDonald, M. G., Harbaugh, A. W. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model (Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey Issue book 6, chap. A1).
Moench, A. F. 1997. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer. Water Resources Research, 33(6), 1397-1407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00651
Neuman, S. P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research, 8(4), 1031-1045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i004p01031
Neuman, S. P. 1974. Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 10(2), 303-312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i002p00303
Theis, C. V. 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 16(2), 519-524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519
Thiem, G. 1906. Hydrologische Methoden: Leipzig, Germany. JM Gebhardt, 56p.
Vatankhah, A. R. 2014. Full-range solution for the Theis well function. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(3), 649-653. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000833
Winston, R. B. 2019. ModelMuse Version 4: a graphical user interface for MODFLOW 6. Scientific Investigations Report-US Geological Survey(2019-5036).
Zhai, Y., Cao, X., Jiang, Y., Sun, K., Hu, L., Teng, Y., Wang, J., Li, J. 2021. Further discussion on the influence radius of a pumping well: A parameter with little scientific and practical significance that can easily be misleading. Water, 13(15), 2050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152050